Tagged “gdpr”
4 articles
DMARC aggregate vs forensic reports
DMARC sends two kinds of feedback: aggregate (rua) reports and forensic (ruf) reports. They answer different questions and carry very different privacy risks. This guide explains exactly what each contains, why forensic reports have all but vanished, the data-protection considerations on both sides, and how to turn the aggregate data into a safe path from p=none to p=reject.
Read more
Double opt-in and why it matters
Confirmed (double) opt-in keeps spam-trap hits, bounces and complaints off your list, the exact reputation signals that decide whether your authenticated mail reaches the inbox and clears the Gmail and Yahoo bulk-sender rules.
Read more
Email authentication for financial services
For banks, insurers and fintechs, DMARC, SPF, DKIM, MTA-STS and BIMI are anti-fraud and brand-protection controls, not deliverability tweaks. How to meet regulatory expectations and reach p=reject across a multi-vendor estate without breaking OTP or statement mail.
Read more
GDPR and DMARC reporting
DMARC reports can contain personal data: source IPs in aggregate reports, and recipients, subjects and message bodies in forensic reports. Here is which fields the UK and EU GDPR catch, why forensic (ruf) reporting is the real hazard most domains should drop, and the lawful basis, retention and transfer practices that keep aggregate (rua) collection compliant.
Read more